Tag Archives: Flexible learning

Online Distance Learning – Challenges, Conversations, Solutions

David Eddy & Dr Colette Fegan
@sonofedd / @colfegan

Parallel session 3, CoLab 3.5

Short Abstract
This workshop will explore the challenges and barriers associated with online distance learning (ODL). Examples of how Allied Health Professions teams have overcome these to offer innovative and engaging flexible learning opportunities will be shared. The collective wisdom of the group will be harnessed to draw out key emergent themes and considerations.

Back to event programme

Detailed Outline
A full online distance learning (ODL) experience is the default offer in the AHP department. This includes PG education aimed at physiotherapists, occupational therapists, therapeutic radiographers, diagnostic radiographers and practitioners working in the areas of prostate cancer care, vocational rehabilitation and supportive and palliative care.

This workshop functions as a ‘think tank’ and will explore some of the opportunities and challenges that ODL presents at SHU. It will offer a clear and structured framework for delivery and support of students undertaking a distance learning experience. The workshop will explore some of the myths around distance learning and also some of the barriers and how teams in the department of AHP have overcome these. Examples of innovation and engagement of an online community will be shared.

Prior to the workshop, participants will be sent an online survey to complete asking 3 key questions:

1) What is the 1 key ingredient for success in online distance learning?
2) What is the 1 key enabler which would support and encourage the development of an online distance learning programme?
3) What is the 1 the barrier which hinders successful development and/or delivery of online distance learning courses.

Respondents answers will be collated to utilise in the workshop
Workshop participants will be split into discussion groups, facilitated by the co-presenters, focussing upon strategies and approaches to enable ODL provision to develop, and flourish.
A plenary will bring together the collective wisdom and draw out the key themes which have emerged and identify any key considerations for the institution, faculties, departments or course teams.

If desired by the participants, we will carry on the conversations online and build a resource and support toolkit for developing ODL.

Whose flexibility? Being, belonging and becoming

Stella Jones-Devitt & Graham Holden
@GrahamJHolden

Parallel session 3, CoLab 3.4

See an animation which describes the project process on YouTube (opens in new window)
Project Overview .docx
Aggregated Responses From Key Informants .docx
Student Case Studies .docx

Short Abstract
This is a joint venture between Catherine Arnold, Jean Harris-Evans, Graham Holden, Stella Jones-Devitt, Rebecca Khanna and Ann-marie Steele.

The flexibility of our academic infrastructure, our pedagogies and our curricula are key enabling factors in learner engagement. This session will share the outcomes of a HEA-sponsored project aimed at gaining a better understanding of the University’s conditions of flexibility and the barriers to learner engagement.

Back to event programme

Detailed Outline
SHU’s diverse student population includes 10,000 part-time students (HESA 2013). The University strategy (2014-2020) has prioritised enhancing work with part-time students and employers as a key part of its flexible ambitions. The Learning and Teaching Strategy (2014) aligns by striving to provide students with a high-quality inclusive experience, facilitating high levels of engagement with their learning.

This implies going beyond the HEFCE definition of flexible learning which allows students to have information they need to make informed choices about what, where and how they want to study. This ‘information-marketplace’ approach fails to capture complex tensions identified by Barnett (2014) when constructing conditions of flexibility. Given the University’s strategic commitment to inclusivity, the approach resonates with Tinto’s (2008) recognition that access without support is not opportunity.

SHU needs to establish institution-wide responsiveness to the flexibility agenda to create a necessarily unique profile to establish conditions of flexibility. In response to this agenda, the University successfully applied in November 2014 for inclusion in the HEA’s Strategic Enhancement Programme (SEP) on Flexible Learning.

This session shares the outcomes of the resulting project Whose flexibility? Being, belonging and becoming which was established to scope a range of diverse voices in order to help us in beginning to understand what flexible learning might mean to the institution in both systems and pedagogy across the student lifecycle. These voices initially comprised a set of ‘key informants’ deemed able to offer often under-represented views such as those of in-work students and the institution’s staff committed to pushing boundaries for inclusive practice. They were asked to comment upon the 12 Conditions of Flexibility (Barnett, 2014) and nominate further key informants as part of a research snowball method in order to build an emerging understanding of some alternative perspectives. This evidence-base helps examine whether there is any cogent Institution-wide understanding concerning the significance of ‘flexibility’ in beginning to build a compelling rationale for future developments.

This session explores the methodology developed – within the constraints of time and resource – to appraise the widest range of stakeholder expectations for flexible learning. It will go on to explore the outcomes of this work and the implications of these expectations for our flexible learning offer and the University’s strategic ambitions concerning inclusivity.